UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN INVESTOR-STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: PRESENT ISSUES AND FUTURE CHALLENGES

Authors

  • LU YAN
  • TIE FATT HEE

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Investor-State Dispute Settlement, Algorithmic Regulation, Arbitration, Algorithmic Ethics

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) has emerged as a transformative force, promising to streamline complex investor-state arbitration processes and enhance the accuracy of legal determinations. However, this technological advancement also presents several challenges, necessitating a critical examination of the role of AI in shaping the future of ISDS. This paper evaluates the impact of AI on ISDS, highlighting its potential to improve investor-state arbitration by enriching efficiency, objective decision-making, and advanced evidence analysis. It acknowledges the capacity of AI in refining risk assessment and predicts dispute outcomes, providing a cutting-edge approach to ISDS. However, the analysis also addresses significant concerns, including algorithmic bias, the ethical implications of decision-making, and the overreliance on technology that may overlook the complexity of human judgment. To overcome these challenges, the paper suggests a regulatory framework that mandates transparency and accountability, ensures justice through rigorous algorithm audits, and promotes a collaborative relationship between humans and AI. By maintaining human autonomy and enhancing the role of AI as an assistive tool, especially in intricate cases, the paper advocates for a balanced integration of AI in ISDS, striving for a harmonious blend of technological innovation and human expertise in future arbitration processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-12

How to Cite

LU YAN, & TIE FATT HEE. (2025). UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN INVESTOR-STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT: PRESENT ISSUES AND FUTURE CHALLENGES. Journal of Malaysian and Comparative Law, 51(1), 31–62. Retrieved from https://fiqh.um.edu.my/index.php/JMCL/article/view/62039